Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Tittsworth

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 11, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

The appellant, as plaintiff below, filed his bill 'of complaint in the Circuit Court in which he prayed that defendant, as chief of police of the City of Tampa, be restrained from requiring him to pay the license fee required by paragraph (b) of Ordinance 437-A, to engage in the business of auctioneer. An answer and a motion to dismiss the bill were filed and the latter was granted. This appeal is from that decree.

Ordinance 437-A is as follows:

“(a) Auctioneer's — Engaged in conducting auction sales of goods, wares, and merchandise at a permanently established place of business commonly known…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Emert v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Baccus v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. State ex rel. Bonsteel v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Borough of Warren v. GeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  5. Quartlebaum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steinberg-Baum & Co. v. Dayton CountrymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Lawson v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. City of Miami v. IC Sales, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. O'Connell v. KontojohnSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. Chandler Services, Inc. v. Florida CityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API