Skaugstad v. Winch
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.
The facts in this case present the following issues: (1) Whether the testimony establishes an express agreement between Violet Skaugstad and Fred Rienow to compensate her for services she rendered in behalf of his brother, William Rienow, and (2) whether there was an express agreement between Violet Skaugstad and Fred Rienow that she would be compensated for the services rendered to him.
Violet Skaugstad worked and cared for William Rienow for one year prior to his death, and for Fred Rienow for six years prior to his death.
The testimony established that after William’s death, Violet Skaugstad…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tyler v. BurringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Murtha v. DonohooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Estate of BreitzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Frieders v. Estate of FriedersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Estate of FredericksenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Matter of Estate of SteffesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Estate of HuberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- In Matter of Estate of SteffesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980