Legal Opinion

Mullen v. City of Racine

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 12, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00275Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN SHARON MULLEN and RENEE MULLEN, Plaintiffs, Case No. 23-cv-275-pp v. CITY OF RACINE, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. NO. 34), DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DKT. NO. 2), DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DISCOVERY (DKT. NO. 43) AND DISMISSING CASE I. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiffs Sharon Mullen and Renee Mullen own a three-story commercial building located at 221 Sixth Street in downtown Racine, Wisconsin.1 See Dkt. No. 1-1 at 6. Between June 2021…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API