Spaulding v. Wood County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
For several years prior to 1929, the defendant, hereafter called the county, had employed a county agricultural representative, hereafter called county agent, pursuant to the provisions of sec. 59.87, Stats. R. A. Peterson was such county agent. The county board had also appointed a special committee on agriculture. Sec. 59.87 (9). On May 15, 1929, a meeting of the committee was held for the purpose of adopting a program for the ensuing year. The program adopted included the project of improving dairy herds through the so-called mail-order system of testing cows. It was thought that at least…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- City of Ft. Scott v. W. G. Eads Brokerage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Trester v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Koch v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Blades v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Maier v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Dodge County v. KaiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Jackson County v. State Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Sell v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Opinion No. Oag 21-80, (1980), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.