Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Wood County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1935PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

For several years prior to 1929, the defendant, hereafter called the county, had employed a county agricultural representative, hereafter called county agent, pursuant to the provisions of sec. 59.87, Stats. R. A. Peterson was such county agent. The county board had also appointed a special committee on agriculture. Sec. 59.87 (9). On May 15, 1929, a meeting of the committee was held for the purpose of adopting a program for the ensuing year. The program adopted included the project of improving dairy herds through the so-called mail-order system of testing cows. It was thought that at least…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. City of Ft. Scott v. W. G. Eads Brokerage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. Trester v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Koch v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Blades v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Maier v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Dodge County v. KaiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Jackson County v. State Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Sell v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Opinion No. Oag 21-80, (1980), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API