Legal Opinion

Papais v. Papais CA3

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 2020No. C088688Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 11/10/20 Papais v. Papais CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (San Joaquin) ---- JOHN DUANE PAPAIS, C088688 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. STKPRTR20180000117) v. DANIEL PAPAIS, Defendant and Respondent. John Papais,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Nielsen v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Bond v. Pulsar Video ProductionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. StearnsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API