Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. City of Buffalo

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRobert E. Noonan, J.

The defendant, City of Buffalo, moves to dismiss the complaint in the above-entitled action on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The respondents, City of Buffalo, Anthony *608Manguso, and Joseph J. Cooley, make a similar motion as to the petition, in the above-entitled proceeding.

The action and proceeding arise out of the enactment by the Council» of the City of Buffalo of two local laws on December 23,1958, which were signed by the Mayor of the city on January 3, 1959. These laws are designated as Local Laws Nos. 1 and 2 (1959).

Local Law No. 1…

2Cases cited22 opinions

Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
Helme v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
Robertson v. ZimmermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
Bareham v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Grimm v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959