Legal Opinion

BRUYETTE v. Wyoming

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2011No. S-10-0250PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] William Arthur - Bruyette was charged with felony possession of marijuana. At trial, he sought to introduce evidence that he obtained the marijuana in California with a prescription for medical marijuana. The district court granted the State's in limine motion to exclude evidence relating to a medical marijuana defense and instructed the jury that possession of medical marijuana was not a defense to the crime charged. The jury convicted Mr. Bruyette of felony possession of marijuana. Mr. Bruyette appeals, claiming the district court denied him his constitutional right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Proffit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Formisano v. GastonWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carla Stalcup v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Michael Jesse Munoz v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Carla Stalcup v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API