BRUYETTE v. Wyoming
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Chief Justice.
[¶1] William Arthur - Bruyette was charged with felony possession of marijuana. At trial, he sought to introduce evidence that he obtained the marijuana in California with a prescription for medical marijuana. The district court granted the State's in limine motion to exclude evidence relating to a medical marijuana defense and instructed the jury that possession of medical marijuana was not a defense to the crime charged. The jury convicted Mr. Bruyette of felony possession of marijuana. Mr. Bruyette appeals, claiming the district court denied him his constitutional right…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Proffit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Formisano v. GastonWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carla Stalcup v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Michael Jesse Munoz v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Carla Stalcup v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013