Legal Opinion · Dissent
Washington Sportservice, Inc. v. The M. J. Uline Company
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 25, 1963No. 16829Published
1DissentBazelon, Chief Judge
The threshold question concerns the application of the “law of the case” doctrine. I think the court applies this-doctrine incorrectly.
The Uline Arena was opened early in 1941 for the production of shows, indoor *894athletic contests and other entertainments. On November 14, 1941, Jacobs Brothers and Uline entered into a contract, to expire June 15, 1947, under which Jacobs Brothers obtained exclusive concession rights for the sale of refreshments, novelties, programs and program advertising, in return for specified percentages of the concessionaire’s gross sales receipts. By an exchange of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.