Legal Opinion
Russell v. Cox
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1944No. 7163PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ÁILSHIE, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint and dismissing her action. The complaint alleges:
“That the plaintiff, Ruth Russell, is the mother, and the defendant, Marcus E. Cox, is the surviving husband of Lottie Melvina Cox, deceased; that the decedent died childless, and she was pre-deceased by her father; that the said plaintiff and the said defendant are all of the heirs at law of the said decedent.
“That the defendant, Marcus E. Cox, on or about the 16th of July, 1942, with force of arms, did wrongfully shoot and mortally wound the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Pezzulli v. D'AmbrosiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Kaczorowski v. KalkosinskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Maine v. James Maine & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Northern Pacific Railway Company v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Volk v. BaldazoIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Evans v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Castorena v. General ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Welch v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- Apitz v. DamesOregon Supreme Court · 1955
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.