Legal Opinion

Bowmam v. Bowman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1956No. 4598PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law.

The parties were husband and wife until April, 1947, when Stalma Bowman secured a divorce and custody of their only child. The divorce judgment awarded $9 a week for the support of the child, although no specific request for such support was prayed for in the petition.

George Bowman paid nothing on this support order, claiming that he did not know of the order, and further that Stalma Bowman had agreed that, if he did not contest the action for divorce as filed by her, she would not ask for nor expect him to support their child. George Bowman did, however,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Krasnow v. KrasnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  4. Mullins v. MullinsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Smith v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gramelspacher v. GramelspacherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  2. Ex Parte ElliottOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API