Legal Opinion

F. M. Hubbell, Son & Co. v. City of Des Moines

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 19, 1915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — IIon. Hugh Brennan, Judge. Petition to enjoin the collection of certain special assessments was dismissed and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

I. Lots 58, 59 and 60 belong to F. M. Hubbell, Son & Company, and Lots 55, 56 and 57 to the trustees of the F. M. Hubbell estate. All are in Polk & Hubbell Park in the city of Des Moines and about 28th Street between Forest Drive and Terrace Eoad. Separate suits were brought by *420the respective owners to enjoin the collection of special assessments levied against these lots and these subsequently were consolidated. These assessments were levied to pay for vitrified brick pavement with Portland cement concrete foundation laid in said street, in pursuance of the statutes of the state and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allen v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Heman v. GilliamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. City of Leavenworth v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  4. Shaver v. J. W. Turner Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. City of Sedalia ex rel. Taylor v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fisher v. L. E. Whitham & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ellyson v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Benshoof v. City of Iowa FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Lytle v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Landis v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API