Legal Opinion

Haynor v. Haynor

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 9, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk. Decree for the complainant. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

*124This bill was filed under Va. Code, 1904, sec. 2258, by the appellee against her husband, to obtain a divorce from bed and board for alleged cruelty and reasonable apprehension of bodily harm, and for alimony. There was a demurrer to the bill, which was overruled; and upon final hearing the court pronounced the decree under review, granting the divorce and awarding alimony.

The bill abounds in inferences based on the pleader’s conclusions from unrevealed facts; but with the exception of the indefinite and general allegations, that the defendant had “threatened bodily harm to your oratrix, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  2. Carr v. CarrSupreme Court of Virginia · 1872
  3. Ohm v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Coldiron v. Asheville Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  5. House v. HouseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cecil v. KnappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Haskins v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  3. Deusenberry v. DeusenberryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Montgomery v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  5. Kirn v. KirnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API