Parise v. Fehnel
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying motions for judgment n. o. v. and new trial. A jury awarded damages to appellees in their negligence action against appellant. The sole issue before us is whether the lower court erred in not granting appellant’s request that it charge the jury that:
If you find as a fact that the car operated by the Plaintiff, Tiny Jo Parise, was equipped with a seat belt system and that the Plaintiff, Tiny Jo Parise, failed to use the seat belts at the time of the accident, you may use this fact of a failure to use the seat belt as evidence of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Britton v. DoehringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Grim v. BetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Halvorson v. VoellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Hanlon v. SorensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- McKee v. Southeast Delco School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Kolbeck v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.