Legal Opinion

McCabe Hamilton & Renny Co., Ltd. v. Chung

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 2002No. 23176, 23398PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LIM, JJ.

These two consolidated appeals (Nos. 23176 & 23398) center around two temporary restraining orders (TROs or, singular, TRO), both initially sought ex parte, entered by the circuit court of the first circuit in favor of Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellees McCabe Hamilton & Renny Company, Ltd. (McCabe) and three of its employees, Kyle Soares (Soares), John A. Dias (Dias) and Earl Kini Kalaiwa‘a (Kalaiwa'a), and against another of McCabe’s employees, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant Dean Kawailani Chung (Chung). The first of the TROs was issued in a special proceeding,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien GesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Brownlow v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hamilton Ex Rel. Lethem v. LethemHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Chung v. McCabe Hamilton & Renny Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Right to Know Committee v. City CouncilHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Diamond v. State, Board of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Vinson v. Association of Apartment Owners of Sands of KahanaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API