Legal Opinion

Chung v. McCabe Hamilton & Renny Co., Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2006No. 25458PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that (1) Defendants-Appellees Marr, Hipp, Jones, & Pepper (MHJP) and Andrew L. Pepper [collectively, Appellees], as attorneys for earlier and dismissed employer-defendants, may raise, as agents of their employers, the doctrine of preemption under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) on a summary judgment motion; (2) the claims of Plaintiff-Appellant Dean Ka-wailani Chung (Appellant) against Appellees for abuse of process and malicious prosecution, as well as the derivative claims of conspiracy and aiding and abetting related to these torts, are…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Donastorg v. Daily News Publishing Co.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  4. Rodenhurst v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
  5. Enriquez v. Countrywide Home Loans, FSBDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API