In re Omega Optical, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*159MEMORANDUM
BRUCE FOX, Bankruptcy Judge.
Presently before me is the chapter 11 debtor’s motion for the entry of a final decree, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3022, as well as a motion filed by Sovereign Bank to amend its proof of claim, which motion is opposed by the debtor.
After consideration of the arguments of counsel,1 I conclude for the following reasons that Sovereign Bank’s motion must be denied and the debtor’s motion denied without prejudice.
I
The following relevant facts are derived from court records.2
The debtor filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under chapter…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas v. City of Philadelphia (In re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Cusato v. Springleaf Financial, Inc. (In re Cusato)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Beyha v. Conestoga Title Insurance CompanyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Fawwaz F. BeyhaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- In re Ateco Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2015