Legal Opinion

In re Omega Optical, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 2012No. 11-13036PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*159MEMORANDUM

BRUCE FOX, Bankruptcy Judge.

Presently before me is the chapter 11 debtor’s motion for the entry of a final decree, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3022, as well as a motion filed by Sovereign Bank to amend its proof of claim, which motion is opposed by the debtor.

After consideration of the arguments of counsel,1 I conclude for the following reasons that Sovereign Bank’s motion must be denied and the debtor’s motion denied without prejudice.

I

The following relevant facts are derived from court records.2

The debtor filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under chapter…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. City of Philadelphia (In re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Cusato v. Springleaf Financial, Inc. (In re Cusato)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Beyha v. Conestoga Title Insurance CompanyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Fawwaz F. BeyhaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. In re Ateco Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API