Legal Opinion
Dynasty, Inc. v. Winter Park Associates, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 2000No. 99CA1068PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RULAND.
Defendant, Winter Park Associates, Inc., appeals from the judgment determining that plaintiff, Dynasty, Inc., holds title to certain real property. We affirm.
In 1876, a town-site patent was issued to Central City by the United States. The plat included an area designated as Block 42. However, the patent expressly excepted from the conveyance lands contained within either federally patented mining claims or lands known to have valuable mineral claims.
Later, Uranium Company of America (UCA) acquired title to both the surface rights and the mineral rights to the lots and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mitchell v. EspinosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Bald Eagle Mining and Refining Company v. BruntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Gilpin Investment Co. v. Perigo Mines CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Webermeier v. PaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. North Colorado Springs Land & Improvement Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Battle North, LLC v. Sensible Housing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Amos v. Aspen Alps 123, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Argus Real Estate, Inc. v. E-470 Public Highway AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Mindock v. Bruff DumarsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019