Marr v. Back Bay Architectural Commission
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This is the first time that either of our appellate courts has had occasion to consider the powers and duties of the Superior Court in reviewing decisions of the Back Bay Architectural Commission (St. 1966, c. 625, as amended). It is also the first time since the decision in Cormier v. Carty, 381 Mass. 234, 235-238 (1980), and Markell v. Sidney B. Pfeifer Foundation, Inc., 9 Mass. App. Ct. 412, 414-418 (1980), that either appellate court has concluded that it must reject findings of fact and conclusions of law which a trial judge has copied almost verbatim from proposals submitted by counsel…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- First Pennsylvania Mortgage Trust v. Dorchester Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Markell v. Sidney B. Pfeifer Foundation, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Lewis v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Beacon Hill Architectural CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- 39 Joy Street Condominium Ass'n v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Crittenton Hastings House of the Florence Crittenton League v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Northshore Chiropractic v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Padden v. West BoylstonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.