Jensen v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On March 20, 1990, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) determined that “new and material” evidence had not been submitted to reopen a claim of service connection for a dorsal spine condition. In July 1990, appellant filed a Notice of Appeal with this Court. Appellant contended that his “new and material” evidence consisted of the application of 38 C.F.R. § 3.306(b)(2) (1993). On March 2, 1993, 4 Vet.App. 304, this Court held that 38 C.F.R. § 3.306(b)(2) did not constitute “new and material” evidence, and, therefore, affirmed the BVA decision. In April 1993, appellant appealed…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Masors v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Cox v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- George C. Jensen, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Jensen v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
4Cited by4 opinions
- Brian E. Routen, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Routen v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Brian E. Routen, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Davis v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998