Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided March 2, 1993No. 90-661PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLDAWAY, Associate Judge:

Appellant is seeking service connection for aggravation he avers he incurred in service to a back condition (kyphosis) that preexisted his service. Appellant argues that in determining whether “new and material” evidence had been submitted that would require reopening his previously denied claim, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) failed to consider the “evi-dentiary presumptions” arising from the aggravation to his back that he alleges was incurred incident to combat. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.306(b)(2) (1992). The Court, sua sponte, raised an additional issue of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Falzone v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  2. George C. Jensen, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Brown v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  4. Jensen v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  5. 09-39 170Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API