Legal Opinion
United States v. Aburahmah
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 20, 1993No. CR 92-705 TUC JMRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROLL, District Judge.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of kidnap for murder of his wife, Emerald Crawford Aburahmah. Defendant Aburahmah has moved for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33, Fed.R.Crim.P., based upon four arguments:
1) The government failed to prove that the victim was alive when she was transported across state lines;
2) Even if the victim was alive when she was transported across state lines, the government failed to prove that she was transported against her will;
3) The district court erroneously admitted evidence of uncharged misconduct, including defendant’s possession of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Ronald W. ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- McKinney v. ReesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Ronald J. PimentelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aburahmah v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995