Legal Opinion
State v. Forler
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1951No. 31493PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
— This appeal has been brought to challenge the sufficiency of an information, under which appellant was convicted of the crime of negligent homicide and of the additional crime of failure to stop and identify after an accident. The information was phrased in two counts, and read as follows:
“COUNT I
“Comes now Ronald R. Hull, Prosecuting Attorney of Yakima County, Washington, and by this information accuses Donald Forler of the crime of Negligent Homicide committed as follows:
“Donald Forler, on or about October 14, 1949, within Yakima County, Washington, then and there being, did then and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The People v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. BolsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- People v. MakiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. RandallWashington Supreme Court · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. RoyseWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. FateleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- State v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.