Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Gingras

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 15, 1997No. 94-C-834PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

RANDA, District Judge.

This is a diversity suit seeking damages for alleged attorney malpractice. The case comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants Robert J. Gingras and Fox & Fox, S.C., f/k/a Fox, Fox, Schaefer & Gin-gras (collectively “Gingras”), for summary judgment and on the cross-motion of Plaintiff Gary McKnight (“McKnight”) for partial summary judgment. For the reasons elaborated below, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied, the plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on causation is granted, and the Court, on its own motion, grants…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. Quarles and Brady, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API