Legal Opinion

Apple v. American National Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 1924No. 14565PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This action was originally commenced by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, in the district court of Carter county, against R. A. Peterson and T. C. Bridgman, upon two promisory notes, one in the sum of $12,000, and one in the sum of $460.

Service was had upon the defendants January 13, 1923, and on January 18, motion to quash was filed, and overruled by the court on March 21, 1923, and defendants given 30 days within which to answer.

January 29, 1923, the defendant, T. C. Bridgman conveyed the property described in plaintiff’s supplemental petition to his step-daughter,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Johnson v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Randall v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Courtney v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Rogers v. BomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Arkansas City v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Koch Engineering Co. v. FaulconerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Rhodes v. LamarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Payne v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Crutchfield v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API