Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Petrenko

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2010No. 107503 RelPublished

1Concurrence

JUSTICE FREEMAN,

specially concurring:

I join fully in that section of today’s opinion which addresses the summary dismissal of defendant’s postconviction petition. Although I ultimately agree with the court’s resolution of the consecutive-sentencing issue, I do so for reasons other than those set forth in the court’s opinion.

In challenging his consecutive sentences, defendant relies on People v. Palmer, 218 Ill. 2d 148 (2006). Palmer holds that because the Habitual Criminal Act is a separate sentencing scheme from the Unified Code of Corrections, the Unified Code’s consecutive-sentencing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. People v. ColonIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Commitment of SimonsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Moehle v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API