Legal Opinion

State v. Freudenthaler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 25, 1987No. 85-2404C2; CA A38270PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant pled guilty to a charge of robbery, and the trial court entered judgment. Defendant appeals, assigning as errors alleged defects in the trial court’s acceptance of his guilty plea and its refusal to allow him to withdraw the plea. The state moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that we lack jurisdiction to consider the issues raised because of the limitations on appeal in ORS 138.050, 1 which at the relevant time provided, in pertinent part:

“A defendant who has pleaded guilty or no contest may take an appeal from a judgment on conviction where it imposes a sentence that is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. City of Klamath Falls v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Tompkins v. District Boundary BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baal v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. ZellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Laseur v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Lawson v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API