Legal Opinion

State v. Britt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1986No. 855SC1006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charges. Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to show that he used force to commit the sexual offense. We disagree.

A person who engages in a sexual act with another person “[b]y force and against the will of the other person,” is guilty of a second degree sexual offense. G.S. 14-27.5. Under our sexual offense statutes, actual physical force is not required to satisfy the statutory requirement that the act be committed by force and against the will of the victim; fear of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. LesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re ClappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re ClappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API