Legal Opinion

Julia Ann Glanzman v. Metropolitan Management Corporation Julia A. Glanzman, Joseph W. Fries v. Metropolitan Management Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 14, 2004No. 03-4546, 03-4547PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

Here we decide two separate, but related appeals from orders of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Metropolitan Management (“Metropolitan”) in a complaint by Julia Glanzman in Appeal No. 03-4546 under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2000) and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 P.S. §§ 951-963 (1991) and also in a similar complaint brought by Joseph Fries in Appeal No. 03-4547.

Glanzman’s primary argument is that the district court erred in determining that she had failed to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Stephen Fakete v. Aetna, Inc., D/B/A Aetna/us HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Richard J. Kautz v. Met-Pro CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Mercer v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Barber v. SubwayDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Boandl v. GeithnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Cellucci v. RBS Citizens, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API