Legal Opinion
Barber v. Subway
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 18, 2015No. Civil Action No. 1:14-CV-613PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief Judge.
Presently before the court in the above-captioned action is the motion (Doc. 24) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a) filed by defendant Subway (“Subway”). Subway seeks summary judgment with respect to all claims asserted by plaintiff Kiera Barber (“Barber”), a former employee, who alleges that Subway discriminated against her as a result of her disability, failed to accommodate her disability, and retaliated against her for requesting an accommodation, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Sowell v. Kelly Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- ABRAHAM v. BRENNANDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Achebe v. Bloomsburg University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Alford v. BaylorDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Baldwin v. Schuylkill Auto Sales, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.