In Re the Complaint Against Judge Grady
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, J.
I agree that Judge Grady should be disciplined.
I also agree with the majority that inasmuch as it declares sec. 757.025, Stats. 1981-82, unconstitutional, it ought to adopt a rule encompassing the broad public policy decision reflected in sec. 757.025.1 Although I would have preferred to submit the formulation of a rule to the Judicial Council, where public, open deliberations by representatives of the public, the bar, the legislature, and the trial and appellate bench may be held, I am satisfied that a public hearing in November after six months’ experience with the rule may be a reasonable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Wurtz v. FleischmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re Constitutionality of Chapter 315, Laws of 1943Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- In re Constitutionality of Statute Empowering Supreme Court to Promulgate Rules Regulating Pleading, Practice, & Procedure in Judicial ProceedingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.