Legal Opinion

Clark v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 14, 2021No. 2:19-cv-11410Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ANDRE L. CLARK, Plaintiff, No. 19-11410 v. District Judge Paul D. Borman Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen FORD MOTOR COMPANY and FORD MOTOR COMPANY GENERAL RETIREMENT PLAN Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Andre L. Clark brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Statement of Procedural Challenge in an ERISA Case [ECF No. 33] as to Count I of his first amended complaint, which is a claim for benefits under 29 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Garcia v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Putney v. Medical MutualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API