Legal Opinion

United States v. Consiglio

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 4, 1975No. Crim. H-24PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT UPON THE GROUND OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

Defendants were charged in a nine-count indictment filed on October 30, 1970 with substantive and conspiracy violations of the interstate gambling laws. Pre-trial motions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2518(10)(a) (1970) were filed to suppress the evidence obtained by the interception of wire communications on the grounds that in securing wiretap au thorization the government had failed to comply with 18 U.S.C. § 2516(1) (1970). 1 These motions were denied by…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Elia Iannelli, A/K/A Bobby ICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Thomas J. Roba v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Losinno v. HendersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. United States v. TateDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API