Legal Opinion

State v. Nugent

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 10, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Joseph J. Nugent III appeals from a judgment by the District Court (Dover-Foxcroft, Stitham, J.) finding him to have committed the traffic infraction of speeding fifty miles per hour in a twenty-five mile-per-hour zone. See 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2074 (1996 & Supp.2001). Nugent asserts that (1) he was not allowed to make a statement to the court but instead was required to proceed by questions and answers, and (2) he was improperly deprived of his right to a jury trial. We affirm.

[¶ 2] No transcript or statement in lieu of a transcript of the court hearing has been provided. See M.R.App. P.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Putnam v. AlbeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HughesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  2. Rothstein v. MaloneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  3. Jefts v. DennisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. State v. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. State of Maine v. Daniel L. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API