Legal Opinion

Miller v. Broce-O'Dell Concrete Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1957No. 40,665PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This is an appeal by one of the defendants in an action for negligence from an order of the trial court overruling defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition and first amended petition. For clarity, we shall refer to Chalmers-Borton Contractors singly as tihe defendant because the partnership of C. H. Chalmers and J. T. Borton, doing business as Chalmers-Borton Contractors, is the only appealing party notwithstanding the fact the trial court in its journal entry made orders affecting pleadings of Broce-O’Dell Concrete Products, Incorporated,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sundgren v. Topeka Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  2. Wise v. Morgan-Mack Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Erb v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. v. Dodge City Cement Products Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steele v. RappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Curran v. MountAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Steele v. RappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API