Legal Opinion

State v. Belknap

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1906No. 6288PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Rice, J., entered March 28, 1906, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of seduction.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

This was a prose.cution for the crime of se- ■ duction, and from a judgment- of conviction, the present appeal is prosecuted. Errors are assigned in the admission of testimony, in the giving of instructions, and in the overruling of a motion for a new trial, Columbus Stevens, Frank Brooks, and William Chapman were called as witnesses on the part of the appellant, and each testified, on his direct examination, that he had had sexual intercourse with the prosecuting witness prior to the date of the seduction alleged in the information. The following proceedings occurred on the-…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gt. W. Turnpike Co. v. . LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Buel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. State v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  5. State v. . AngelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1846

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. LampshireWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Warren v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. LintonWashington Supreme Court · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API