Legal Opinion

Hansbrough v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 28, 1988No. 88-16PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Judge.

Hansbrough was convicted of a third-degree felony and a first-degree misdemean- or. His presumptive guideline sentence was two-and-a-half to three-and-a-half years. At sentencing, in January, 1986, the trial court determined him to be an habitual offender and imposed a ten-year enhanced sentence. The only reason given for departure was the habitual offender determination. Hansbrough appeals from the denial of a motion to correct his sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) based on the trial court’s use of the habitual offender determination to exceed the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Early v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deese v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Conn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Harvard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API