Legal Opinion

Harvard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 19, 1994No. 94-193PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a summary denial of a rule 3.800 motion. For the following reasons we affirm.

*713Defendant was convicted on three counts of grand theft and placed on community control. Defendant’s recommended guideline sentence was two and one-half to three and one-half years. The trial court, in placing defendant on community control, deviated downward one cell from the recommended guideline sentence. Defendant violated his community control and on October 7, 1986, was ordered to serve five years in prison on each of the three grand theft counts. This sentence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Hendrix v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. State v. PentaudeSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API