Citizens Electric Co. v. Susquehanna Boom Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Lycoming Co., June T., 1906, No. 1, dismissing bill in equity in case of The Citizens Electric Company v. The Susquehanna Boom Company. Bill in equity to compel the opening of the gates of a dam. Before Hart, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Error assigned was decree dismissing bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Mestrezat,
March 14, 1910:
An extended review of the several questions raised on this record is unnecessary. The learned trial judge has filed an exhaustive opinion in which he has found the facts and correctly stated the law applicable thereto. His opinion amply vindicates the correctness of the decree dismissing the bill.
The plaintiff company is the appellant and insists dhat the • court below erred in the findings of both fact and law, and its counsel undertake to point out these errors in their exhaustive brief. We have carefully examined the case, both as to the law *451an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fischer v. Catawissa RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Demuth v. AmwegSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Fries v. Southern Pennsylvania Railroad & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Appeal of HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Chestnut Hill & Spring House Turnpike Co. v. PiperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stowe v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Hutchins v. HaffnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- Plott v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Moser v. GranquistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Citizens Electric Co. v. Susquehanna Boom Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.