Legal Opinion

Town of Elmore v. Town of Coosada

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 25, 2006No. 1030833PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Town of Elmore appeals the trial court's summary judgment holding its annexation invalid because it lacked the requisite consent of the landowners whose property was being annexed. The Town of Elmore also appeals the trial court's summary judgment dismissing its counter-claim challenging an annexation by the Town of Coosada as improper. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

A. The Elmore Annexation

Both the Town of Elmore and the Town of Coosada are located in Elmore County and lie in close proximity to one another. In fact, their police jurisdictions join in some locations. In June 2002,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dykes v. Lane Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Hornsby v. SessionsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Spradlin v. Birmingham Airport AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Stokes ChevroletSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Willow Lake Resi. Asso. v. Juliano, 2081099 (ala.civ.app. 8-27-2010)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. South Alabama Gas District v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Wilson v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  4. Fort Morgan Civic Ass'n v. City of Gulf ShoresSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  5. Irwin v. Jefferson Cnty. Pers. Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API