Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Stokes Chevrolet

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 2003No. 1021446PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

General Motors Corporation ("GM") appeals from the trial court's order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

In an earlier appeal in this case, General Motors Corp. v.Stokes, 850 So.2d 1239 (Ala. 2002) ("Stokes I"), this Court summarized the operative facts. We restate them here.

"Stokes Chevrolet, Inc. (`the Stokes dealership'), operates a dealership in Clanton that, in addition to the Chevrolet line of the Chevrolet Motors Division of General Motors Corporation (`GM'), sold Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, and Jeep vehicles (Stokes's non-GM lines are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. Grady Allen v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. CitiFinancial Corp., LLC v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Hamm v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Pavilion Development v. Jbj PartnershipSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API