Legal Opinion

Michaels v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 17, 2009No. Nos. 334, 2008, 358, 2008, 373, 2008PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Justice.

Lawrence Michaels, Tyreese Hawthorne and Andre Wright, the codefendants below, appeal from final judgments of conviction by the Superior Court. All three defendants claim that the Superior Court abused its discretion by denying a motion for a mistrial after the introduction of allegedly irrelevant and prejudicial evidence. Michaels and Hawthorne raise additional claims. Michaels separately claims that the trial judge violated his right to a fair trial by asking the prosecutor to stand several feet away from him (Michaels) while questioning him about a gun the prosecutor was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Fahy v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  5. Skinner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. Banther v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Morse v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  4. Drummond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  5. Abbatiello v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API