Legal Opinion

Drummond v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 6, 2012No. 247, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

After a first trial, at which a jury convicted the defendant of three crimes, this Court remanded for a new trial because the Superior Court judge failed to thoroughly inform the defendant about the significance of his decision to waive counsel. During retrial, the trial judge allowed the State to present a record of the testimony given at the first trial. Later, a prosecution witness referenced the defendant’s criminal history while responding to a question on cross examination. After being convicted again, the defendant appeals, claiming that both the incidents…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  5. Deputy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cabrera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API