Legal Opinion

Burnet v. Livezey

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1931No. 3072PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.

Tbe present case arises on petition to review a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals to tbe effect that compensa^ tion paid to respondent in 1923, by tbe state of West Virginia, for bis services as counsel for tbe Public Service Commission of that state, was exempt from federal income tax on tbe ground that tbe respondent was an employee of tbe state of West Virginia, and that therefore bis salary as such was exempt from such taxation by virtue of section 1211 of tbe Revenue Act of 1926 (26 USCA § 1065b). That section provides as follows: “Any…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Lucas v. Ox Fibre Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Lucas v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Underwood v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  2. Parkersburg Iron & Steel Co. v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  3. Childers v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Meigs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  5. Lanasa v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API