Legal Opinion

In re Cummins

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 6, 1912PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In the matter of William J. Cummins, bankrupt. On report of special master as to the claims of Frank L,. Crocker.

1Opinion of the Court

A1AYFR, District Judge.

The trustee opposes the confirmation of the report of the special master, which, in effect, upholds the transfer of an automobile (agreed to be worth $600) to an attorney for professional services. At the same time the trustee moves that the expenses of the proceeding be paid by the attorney. The special master has reported at length, and I shall refer only to one question involved.

The claimant, Frank R. Crocker, was- retained by the bankrupt as his attorney on January 14, 1911, and for some weeks examined into the complicated financial affairs of the bankrupt,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re FalkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Tripp v. MitschrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. In Re Klein-Moffett Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1928
  4. In re StolpDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1912
  5. Conrad, Rubin & Lesser v. PenderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API