Legal Opinion
In Re Falk
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 4, 1929No. 138PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
30 F.2d 607 (1929)
In re FALK et al.
MICHELBACHER
v.
HAAR.
No. 138.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 4, 1929.
C. Edward Benoit, of New York City (Julius J. Abeson, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
David Haar, of New York City, in pro. per.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The appellee, David Haar, is a counselor at law. Falk and Leibel consulted Haar about their financial condition, showed him their books, and he found that they were insolvent. He advised them not to sell their assets, consisting of women's…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Wood and HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- In re RosserCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Pratt v. BotheCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- In re RolnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- In re HabeggerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Matter of OlenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- In the Matter of Casco Fashions, Inc., Bankrupt. New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc., Trustee v. Ballon, Stoll & ItzlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Smiley Professional Ass'n v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Conrad, Rubin & Lesser v. PenderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- In Re Paramount-Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.