Legal Opinion

Ford v. Peoples Trust & Savings Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1995No. 87A01-9412-CV-411PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-respondent Lucile Ford claims that the trial court's awards of personal representative and attorney fees are unreasonable.

BACEGROUND

On July 28, 1994, appellees-petitioners Peoples Trust and Savings Bank and Mary J. Derr, as co-personal representatives of the estate of Katie K. Barker, filed a petition requesting that the trial court determine co-personal representative fees and attorney fees. On August 17, 1994, Ford, a devisee of the decedent, filed an objection to this petition. After a hearing, the trial court awarded fees in the amount of $32,000.00 to Derr,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bratton v. YergaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Heirs of the & Objectors to the Petition for Fees Below v. MathesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bankmark of Florida, Inc. v. Star Financial Card Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re Estate of GrimmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Estate of McClenahan v. BibersteinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Paternity of N.L.P. v. SizemoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. In the Matter of the Supervised Estate of John L. Thompson, Sr.: Sandra Riggs v. Robert Laszynski (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API