United States v. Norton
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Duncan, Judge:
When the case we now review was before the Court of Military Review certain opinions of psychiatrists were before that court, which opinions were not in evidence at trial. That court decided that pursuant to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition), paragraph 124,1 relief to the appellant in the form of dismissal of the charges or ordering a rehearing was unwarranted. We reverse.
Nature of the Offense.
On October 5, 1966, appellant Norton and Privates Wallace and Marchant rode together to Tacoma, Washington. Later that evening,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. WimberleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. BurnsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. TriplettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. CorreaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985