Legal Opinion

United States v. Norton

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 6, 1973No. 22,715PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Duncan, Judge:

When the case we now review was before the Court of Military Review certain opinions of psychiatrists were before that court, which opinions were not in evidence at trial. That court decided that pursuant to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition), paragraph 124,1 relief to the appellant in the form of dismissal of the charges or ordering a rehearing was unwarranted. We reverse.

Nature of the Offense.

On October 5, 1966, appellant Norton and Privates Wallace and Marchant rode together to Tacoma, Washington. Later that evening,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. WimberleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  2. United States v. BurnsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. TriplettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. CorreaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API