Legal Opinion

Nuclear Military Monitoring v. Perry

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 31, 1996No. Civil Action No. 95-1289Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are plaintiffs’ Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees, defendants’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees, and Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ Objection to the Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees. Upon consideration of the entire record, the Court denies plaintiffs’ motion for an award of attorney fees.

BACKGROUND

The facts of this case are fully set out in the Court’s Opinion of July 31, 1995, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction.1 In brief:…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Carroll v. President & Commissioners of Princess AnneSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API