Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 3, 1981No. 99-80PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.

At their 1975 divorce the parties entered into a stipulation later incorporated into the judgment. It provided for custody of two children, support payments, and a division of assets. Later, two contempt motions and plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment under V.R.C.P. 60(b) resulted in a combined hearing. The 60 (b) motion alleged newly discovered evidence and fraud in its concealment, leading to the original stipulation, which, among other things, awarded business property of the parties to the defendant. Our disposition of this appeal obviates the need for extensive factual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bill J. Bishop and Joseph R. Haynen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. John Conerly and Barry L. Frasier v. Rose FlowerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. In Re Smith, Bell & Hauck Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  4. State Highway Board v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  5. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cliche v. ClicheSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  2. Guiel v. GuielSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  3. Richwagen v. RichwagenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. Guiel v. GuielSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. Haldeman v. Metropolitan Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API