Legal Opinion

Rifkin v. United States Lines

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 26, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Defendant makes two motions, one, under Rule 37(d), F.R.Civ.P., to strike out plaintiff’s complaint and to dismiss the action because of plaintiff’s failure to submit herself for examination before trial, and the other, under Rule 30(b), F.R.Civ.P., to vacate and set aside plaintiff’s notice of examination of defendant before trial. The first motion involves the question whether a notice of examination of plaintiff before trial was served by defendant at the time the answer was served. The second motion involves the propriety of the provisions of a notice of examination…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Broadcast Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Mattingly v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Schilling-Hillier S. A. Industrial E Comercial v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jose Rivera v. M/t FossarinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Crummer v. BeelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Jefferson v. Spenard Builders' Supply, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Davidson v. District of Columbia Board of MedicineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API